Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.



By JM Talboo and Steve W.

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/10/debunking-myths-on-conspiracy-theories.htmlMany people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth Debunkers.

 

The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States” - 
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 



We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.


[On the left side (above) is a video of WTC 7 collapsing. On the right side is a video of a controlled demolition.]


And it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.


Unsurprisingly, they hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth 'Debunkers' and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public.

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.

FAIR USE NOTICE

National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Thursday, January 18, 2018

No one cares Antifa's Redneck Revolt killed Heather Heyer - Antifa Member Admits to Chasing Down Fields with Gun at Charlottesville



Dwayne Dixon of Redneck Revolt admits that he chased James Alex Fields into his Charger, which led to Fields driving his car into counter protesters. Heather Heyer would sustain injuries leading to heart failure. Sources: https://archive.is/gF1iR https://archive.is/wQb58 https://archive.is/wQb58



No one cares Antifa's Redneck Revolt killed Heather Heyer - Antifa Member Admits to Chasing Down Fields with Gun at Charlottesville

Related:

Making a Murderer Charlottesville: Debunking the Myth of Heather Heyer - Heather Heyer Died of Massive Heart Attack - Graphic content - Heather Heyer was not hit by car:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/10/making-murderer-charlottesville.html

Styxhexenhammer666 Explains Why the Alt-Right is Wrong about Ethno-Nationalism:

https://phnxrizing.blogspot.com/2018/01/styxhexenhammer666-explains-why-alt.html

'Vee' Exposes How Alt-Right's Richard Spencer Would Engage in Violence Like ANTIFA If He Could:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2018/01/vee-exposes-how-alt-rights-richard.html

How To Stop the Alt-Right:

http://mindtreasury.blogspot.com/2017/08/how-to-stop-alt-right.html

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

CNN Rips Off 'WTC7 -- This is an Orange' Video



Original WTC7 -- This is an Orange' Video:



RIP to Anthony Lawson who made this video. I never could convince him that a plane hit the Pentagon! :)

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

The Same Democrats Who Denounce Donald Trump as a Lawless, Treasonous Authoritarian Just Voted to Give Him Vast Warrantless Spying Powers - Trump Was Right 1st Time — FISA Was Used Against Him

Leading congressional Democrats have spent the last year relentlessly accusing Donald Trump of being controlled by or treasonously loyal to a hostile foreign power. Over the last several months, they have added to those disloyalty charges a new set of alleged crimes: abusing the powers of the executive branch — including the Justice Department and FBI — to vindictively punish political opponents while corruptly protecting the serious crimes of his allies, including his own family members and possibly himself.

The inescapable conclusion from all of this, they have relentlessly insisted, is that Trump is a lawless authoritarian of the type the U.S. has not seen in the Oval Office for decades, if ever: a leader who has no regard for constitutional values or legal limits and thus, poses a grave, unique, and existential threat to the institutions of American democracy. Reflecting the severity of these fears, the anti-Trump opposition movement that has coalesced within Democratic Party politics has appropriated a slogan — expressed in the hashtag form of contemporary online activism — that was historically used by those who unite, at all costs, to defeat domestic tyranny: #Resistance.

One would hope, and expect, that those who genuinely view Trump as a menace of this magnitude and view themselves as #Resistance fighters would do everything within their ability to impose as many limits and safeguards as possible on the powers he is able to wield. If “resistance” means anything, at a minimum it should entail a refusal to trust a dangerous authoritarian to wield vast power with little checks or oversight.

Yesterday in Washington, congressional Democrats were presented with a critical opportunity to do exactly that. A proposed new amendment was scheduled to be voted on in the House of Representatives that would have imposed meaningful limits and new safeguards on Trump’s ability to exercise one of the most dangerous, invasive, and historically abused presidential powers: spying on the communications of American citizens without warrants. Yesterday’s amendment was designed to limit the powers first enacted during the Bush years to legalize the Bush/Cheney domestic warrantless eavesdropping program. The Intercept’s Alex Emmons on Wednesday detailed the history and substance of the various bills pending in the House.

Although the Trump White House and a majority of House Republicans (including House Speaker Paul Ryan and House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes) favored extension (and even an expansion) of the current law’s spying powers and opposed any real reforms, a substantial minority of GOP lawmakers have long opposed warrantless surveillance of Americans and thus, announced their intention to support new safeguards. Indeed, the primary sponsor and advocate of the amendment to provide new domestic spying safeguards was the conservative Republican from Michigan, Justin Amash, who, in the wake of the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations, worked in close partnership with liberal Democratic Rep. John Conyers to try to rein in some of these domestic spying powers.

Despite opposition from GOP House leadership and the Trump White House, Amash was able to secure the commitment of dozens of House Republicans to support his amendments to limit the ability of Trump’s FBI to spy on Americans without warrants. The key provision of his amendment would have required that the FBI first obtain a warrant before being permitted to search and read through the communications of Americans collected by the National Security Agency.

To secure enactment of these safeguards, Amash needed support from a majority of House Democrats. That meant that House Democrats held the power in their hands to decide whether Trump — the president they have been vocally vilifying as a lawless tyrant threatening American democracy — would be subjected to serious limits and safeguards on how his FBI could spy on the conversations of American citizens.

Debate on the bill and the amendments began on the House floor yesterday afternoon, and it became quickly apparent that leading Democrats intended to side with Trump and against those within their own party who favored imposing safeguards on the Trump administration’s ability to engage in domestic surveillance. The most bizarre aspect of this spectacle was that the Democrats who most aggressively defended Trump’s version of the surveillance bill — the Democrats most eager to preserve Trump’s spying powers as virtually limitless — were the very same Democratic House members who have become media stars this year by flamboyantly denouncing Trump as a treasonous, lawless despot in front of every television camera they could find.

Leading the charge against reforms of the FBI’s domestic spying powers was Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee who, in countless TV appearances, has strongly insinuated, if not outright stated, that Trump is controlled by and loyal to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Indeed, just this weekend, in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Schiff accused Trump of corruptly abusing the powers of the DOJ and FBI in order to vindictively punish Hilary Clinton and other political enemies. Referring to Trump’s various corrupt acts, Schiff pronounced: “We ought to be thinking in Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, beyond these three years what damage may be done to the institutions of our democracy. ”

Yet just two days later, there was the very same Adam Schiff, on the House floor, dismissing the need for real safeguards on the ability of Trump’s FBI to spy on Americans. In demanding rejection of the warrant requirement safeguard, Schiff channeled Dick Cheney — and the Trump White House — in warning that any warrant requirements would constitute “a crippling requirement in national security and terrorism cases.”
https://theintercept.com/2018/01/12/the-same-democrats-who-denounce-trump-as-a-lawless-treasonous-authoritarian-just-voted-to-give-him-vast-warrantless-spying-powers/

Related:

As No One Watched, Trump Pardoned 5 Megabanks For Corruption Charges

Trump Is Turning the State Department into a Global Weapons Dealer

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, January 16th, 2018.]



Related:

Deep State Spied on both Trump and Sen Sessions

Mueller/FBI: The Deep State Rats Nest Soft Coup Proves Trump Right When Tapping Manafort and Company - BIGGER Than Watergate! Trump Was Right And Limbaugh Knew It: Obama Wiretapped Trump

Roger Stone: Mueller Has Told Manafort To Lie About Trump Or He Will Be Railroaded To Prison - Full Show - Trump Right About Illegal Spying / Morgan Freeman Goes Completely Insane - 09/19/2017

FBI May Have Spied on POTUS Trump

Susan Rice Lied About Unmasking Trump Campaign Members, Media Lauds Her

BREAKING: Samantha Power Caught Unmasking ‘Hundreds’ In Final Year Of Obama Admin

LIMBAUGH: Focus On Russians Is A Deflection From Obama SPYING On The Trump Campaign

Obama Violated Fourth Amendment, Sought Unredacted Intel on US Citizens During Election

BREAKING! TRUMP WAS 100% RIGHT! THE GUARDIAN JUST PROVED FOX NEWS’ JUDGE NAP WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG! - CNN Confirms Judge Napolitano Was Right British Intelligence Help Obama Spy On Trump

New Wiretap Report Unravels CNN's Obama/Susan Rice Cover Up

BREAKING!!! THE FBI JUST CONFIRMED 100% TRUMP WAS RIGHT!!! WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE OBAMA SPIED!!!

LIMBAUGH: TRUMP WAS RIGHT In Claiming That Obama Wiretapped Him - RUSH: 'Very Clear' Obama Admin Spied On Trump And Rice Is Lying Because Those Things Happened Before

Susan Rice Is The First Official To Be Identified As Unmasking Trump People For Political Purposes - Susan Rice Reportedly "Unmasked" Trump in Incidental Data Collection

CNN BREAKING NEWS: TRUMP WIRETAP EVIDENCE CONFIRMED. Trump Spied On By Incidental Collection

Obama's Own Defense Deputy Accidentally Admits Obama Admin Spied On Trump - HANNITY AMBER ALERT: "Evelyn Farkas Get An Attorney Immediately"

Whistle Blower Dennis Montgomery Claims Obama Administration Spied On Trump's Team

Bill Mitchell: Trump always ends up being right. It's almost a little freaky. - The Hoax Collapses: House Intel Chair Says Trump WAS Surveilled

NSA DOCUMENTS PROVE SURVEILLANCE OF DONALD TRUMP & HIS FAMILY

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Nuclear Amber Alert was a Psyop to Distract Clinton Indictments - BREAKING INTEL! Hawaiian Nuclear False Missile Alert Staged By Deep State To Embarrass Trump - Deep State sends Hawaii into state of panic over ballistic missile warning



Nuclear Amber Alert was a Psyop to Distract Clinton Indictments - BREAKING INTEL! Hawaiian Nuclear False Missile Alert Staged By Deep State To Embarrass Trump - Deep State sends Hawaii into state of panic over ballistic missile warning